Threshold tax and benefit traps on families
The media like to bandy about the phrase “stealth tax”. In reality what they call stealth tax isn’t at all. However, there are genuine cliff-edge income thresholds that result in unfair tax charges. What are they and how can you avoid them?
When more can mean less
The thresholds for income tax are generally well known and have predictable effects when exceeded. However, less well understood thresholds exist and can result in surprisingly high tax rates. In 2023/14 for example:
- £50,000, which triggers the high income child benefit charge (HICBC); and
- £100,000, which results in a phased reduction in the personal allowance and withdrawal of all childcare subsidies.
Example - child benefit trap
Florence, who has four children, is due a bonus from her employer. For most people this would be a good thing, but in Florence’s case tax and benefit cliff edges will result in tax trouble. Florence’s child benefit for four children is £3,728 for 2023/24. If the bonus takes her adjusted net income over £50,000, the HICBC kicks in to claw back £37.28 of child benefit for every £100 of excess income. This means her marginal tax rate is over 79%, i.e. for every extra £1 of the bonus she receives between £50,270 and £60,000, she only gets to keep 21p (Scottish tax rates are even higher). As Florence has a student loan she also loses an extra 9% of her bonus in additional repayments. Some good news for Florence is that the 2024 Spring Budget announced that the withdrawal threshold is increasing to £60,000, and the abatement rate reduced to 1% for every £200 of excess income.
In extreme cases the marginal tax rate on additional income can exceed the income.
Childcare and personal allowance traps
It gets even worse where adjusted net income exceeds £100,000, with the double-whammy of the loss of both childcare support and the personal allowance. This cliff edge is so bad that a parent on £115,000 can be left with less than someone whose income is £95,000. Childcare support currently takes the form of:
- tax-free childcare which is a subsidy scheme for children under eleven; and
- 15 free nursery hours for 38 weeks p.a. for pre-school children of working parents (the so-called 30-hour offer).
If income exceeds the £100,000 threshold by just a matter of pence, all of this support disappears for every child and the personal allowance is withdrawn by £1 for every £2 of extra income up to £125,140. By contrast, two parents each earning £99,999, i.e. a household income of £199,998, retain all of their childcare support and full personal allowances.
From April 2024, working parents of two year olds will also be eligible for 15 free nursery hours, extending to 30 hours from September 2025.
If Florence has two pre-school children and two others under eleven, she loses around £18,000 in childcare support if her income exceeds £100,000. With a bonus of £20,000 on top of her usual salary of £95,000, she’ll be worse off until her income reaches just over £136,000.
There are simple steps Florence can take to reduce her tax. She could make additional pension contributions. While this won’t increase her net available income it improves her overall finances by increasing her pension savings. Another option is for Florence to ask her employer for tax-efficient benefits in kind, e.g. an electric company car in lieu of a cash bonus.
Related Topics
-
HMRC writes to non-domiciled taxpayers following rule changes
HMRC has begun issuing “one-to-many” letters to individuals affected by recent changes to the tax rules for non-UK domiciled taxpayers. The letters prompt recipients to review their tax position under the new regime. What does this mean if you receive one?
-
Can officers ignore minor input tax errors?
If your business has claimed input tax on an invoice where the supplier has charged VAT incorrectly, HMRC can disallow your claim by issuing an assessment. Can the officer waive that power to achieve a common sense outcome?
-
Practical guide: Tax-efficient will planning with residential property
An individual has a significant property portfolio which provides them with their sole source of income. They want to gift shares in some property to their daughter but retain the income. Can they do this without triggering the reservation of benefit rules?