Tribunal rejects reliance on adviser as reasonable excuse
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision has confirmed that relying on an accountant does not automatically amount to a reasonable excuse for missing a self-assessment deadline. The case highlights the limits of delegating tax responsibilities. What does this mean in practice?
In the case, the taxpayer argued that their failure to file on time was due to reliance on their adviser, who had been responsible for handling their tax affairs. HMRC rejected this explanation and issued late filing penalties. The tribunal agreed with HMRC. It found that while taxpayers may appoint an agent, responsibility for meeting filing deadlines ultimately remains with the taxpayer. Simply assuming that an adviser will deal with matters is not sufficient to establish a reasonable excuse.
The decision reflects a consistent line in tribunal cases that reliance on a third party will only amount to a reasonable excuse in limited circumstances, such as where the taxpayer has taken reasonable steps to ensure compliance and an unexpected failure occurs. The practical message is clear. Even where an accountant is engaged, you should ensure deadlines are understood and met. Regular communication with advisers and monitoring of filing obligations can help prevent avoidable penalties.
Related Topics
-
Electronic VAT return and payment due
-
Alternative education providers can protect VAT refund claims
HMRC has confirmed that some alternative providers of higher and further education can submit VAT refund claims following a Court of Appeal ruling, despite HMRC appealing the decision to the Supreme Court. What do you need to know?
-
Old IHT forms will be rejected
HMRC has stopped processing old versions of the Inheritance Tax IHT100 forms from 31 August 2026. Anyone reporting an IHT chargeable event involving a gift or trust will need to make sure they are using the correct forms. What do you need to know?