Change to IHT on pensions proposals
HMRC has published a policy statement announcing an important change to its plans to include pension savings in an individual's estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes. What’s the full story?
In her first budget last Autumn Rachael Reeves dropped a number of bombshells. One of the biggest was her proposal to bring pension savings and death benefits within the scope of IHT from 6 April 2027. Currently, IHT only applies in very few circumstances. Where it does the pension companies may be responsible for calculating and deducting any IHT payable before passing the pension savings to the deceased’s beneficiaries. The Chancellor wanted to emulate this process when the new IHT rules were rolled out in 2027.
In a policy paper published on 21 July the government announced that the responsibility for calculating and paying IHT on pension saving will rest with the personal representatives of an estate, e.g. executors, and not pension companies. Although the consultation on the proposed new rules, which is open to everyone, doesn’t close until 15 September it had already become clear that the Chancellor’s original proposal was unrealistic.
Related Topics
-
HMRC writes to non-domiciled taxpayers following rule changes
HMRC has begun issuing “one-to-many” letters to individuals affected by recent changes to the tax rules for non-UK domiciled taxpayers. The letters prompt recipients to review their tax position under the new regime. What does this mean if you receive one?
-
Can officers ignore minor input tax errors?
If your business has claimed input tax on an invoice where the supplier has charged VAT incorrectly, HMRC can disallow your claim by issuing an assessment. Can the officer waive that power to achieve a common sense outcome?
-
Practical guide: Tax-efficient will planning with residential property
An individual has a significant property portfolio which provides them with their sole source of income. They want to gift shares in some property to their daughter but retain the income. Can they do this without triggering the reservation of benefit rules?